Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Halstead

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1895No. 6037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of York county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The plaintiff in error seized certain live stock of the defendant in error found trespassing upon his land. Arbitrators were appointed under the herd law, damages assessed and paid. Among the animals so taken up were certain milch cows. Thereafter the defendant in error brought this action against the plaintiff in error, alleging that while the stock was in his possession he had negligently failed to properly feed, water, and care for said stock, and to milk said cows, whereby said stock was damaged. On the issues joined, which need not be here- set out, there was a verdict for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wasson v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Ballard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Carson v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. First National Bank v. Lowrey Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Robb v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SporerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Crosby v. RitcheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Williams v. McConaugheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API