Legal Opinion

J. W. Sanders Cotton Mill, Inc. v. Moody

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1940No. 33989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellee, who will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff, brought an action against the defendant for personal injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff while working in defendant’s cotton mill. Plaintiff’s work was that of attending to a machine called a spinner frame. As a part of this machine and on each side thereof, there is an aligned row of clearer boards, 15 in number, 40 inches from the floor. The clearer boards were each about 22 inches long; about 3j4 inches wide, and are hollowed out on the lower side so as to be about J4 inch thick; and their weight, each, is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hermann v. Port Blakely Mill Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1896
  2. Fink v. SladeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Williams v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Wilson Co., Inc. v. HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. GordyMississippi Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Belk v. RosamondMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Seaney v. SeaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Simpsen v. Madison General Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Gulf M. N.R. Co. v. MaddenMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. J. W. Sanders Cotton Mills, Inc. v. MoodyMississippi Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API