Legal Opinion

Metz v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1895No. 7708PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

An information was filed in the district court of Lancaster county charging George Metz and Frank Milehem with the crime of burglary, by feloniously breaking and entering, in the night time, the storehouse and warehouse of one Jasper N. Binford. Metz, without objection on his part until after the jury were selected and sworn, was given a separate trial which resulted in a verdict of guilty. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and he was sentenced to an imprisonment of two years’ duration, and to pay the costs of prosecution; from which he prosecutes a petition in error.

Objection is made…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
  2. Heldt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. McJunkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. State v. McLaneNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  5. State v. MarvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. MagersOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. CarnagySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Johns v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. State v. McDowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API