Legal Opinion
Richard Sharp v. Kansas City Power & Light Company and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 13, 2015No. WD77444PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaren King Mitchell, Presiding Judge
Kansas City Power & Light Company and KCP & L Greater Missouri Operations Company (collectively “KCP & L”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to stay litigation and compel arbitration, filed in response to a putative class action filed by Respondents, a group of consumers, which raised claims of breach of contract, negligence, violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, and fraud/misrepresentation, surrounding the consumers’ participation with KCP & L in the Solar Energy Rebate Program. KCP & L argues that, pursuant to a dispute resolution provision found within a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Wolsey, Ltd. v. Foodmaker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Triarch Industries, Inc. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Baier v. Darden RestaurantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- AMF INC. v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hobbs v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Nutrapet Sys., LLC v. Proviera Biotech, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State ex rel. Van Alst v. HarrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Demetria Trunnel v. Missouri Higher Education Loan AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- LEE HOBBS, and JONESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.