Legal Opinion
AMF INC. v. Brunswick Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 4, 1985No. CV-85-2743PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
WEINSTEIN, Chief Judge.
In this case of first impression, AMF Incorporated seeks to compel Brunswick Corporation to comply with their agreement to obtain a non-binding advisory opinion in a dispute over the propriety of advertising claims. For reasons indicated below, the agreement to utilize an alternative dispute resolution mechanism must be enforced.
I. FACTS
AMF and Brunswick compete nationally in the manufacture of electronic and automatic machinery used for bowling centers. In earlier litigation before this court, AMF alleged that Brunswick had advertised certain…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. StottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Bankers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Wolsey, Ltd. v. Foodmaker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.