Legal Opinion

LEE HOBBS, and JONESBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2015No. SD33529Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEE HOBBS, and JONESBURG ) UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, ) individually and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs-Respondents, ) No. SD33529 ) Filed: 10-26-15 v. ) ) TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY Honorable Gayle L. Crane, Circuit Judge AFFIRMED Tamko Building Products, Inc. (Tamko), a manufacturer of roofing shingles, appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of disputes with plaintiffs Lee Hobbs and the Jonesburg United Methodist Church (referred to individually as Hobbs and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. ProCD, Inc. v. ZeidenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Rich Hill and Enza Hill, on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. Gateway 2000, Inc., and David PraisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Robert S. Eaton v. CMH Homes, Inc., and Southern Energy Homes, Inc., and Henry Concrete, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Kunzie v. Jack-In-The-Box, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Baier v. Darden RestaurantsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API