Legal Opinion
Slater v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 23, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
This case is reported to us by a judge who made no decision thereon. It involves construction of a provision in an "all risk” inland marine insurance policy. The parties submitted a statement of agreed facts. See Mass.R.Civ.P. 64, 365 Mass. 831 (1974).
During the years 1971 and 1972 the plaintiff, an orthodontist, was the named insured under an "Inland Marine, Physicians’ and Surgeons’ Equipment Floater” insurance policy. Included as part of that policy was an "Extension of Coverage Endorsement, PS 1415” which provided coverage in paragraph C for loss of money "in the premises” for an amount…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Sun Insurance Office, Limited v. ClaySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Sherman v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Commonwealth v. StasiunMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. RohdeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Slater v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Boyd Motors, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Mellon v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Mc Quade v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984