Legal Opinion
Sherman v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 18, 1961PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.
The two plaintiffs, doing business as Norfolk Laundry and Cleansers hereinafter called Norfolk, excepted to the direction of a verdict for the defendant in this action of contract to recover for a fire loss under a policy of insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiffs.
The policy covered “. . . goods or articles, the property of the assured customers, accepted by the assured for cleaning, . . . while contained in the premises occupied by the assured at 156 Norfolk Street, Dorchester, or in the custody of its collecting agencies or branch stores; and while being transported to and from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- August A. Busch & Co. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Koshland v. Columbia InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Ober v. National Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Hiller v. Submarine Signal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Barnstable County Mutual Fire Insurance v. LallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Worcester Mutual Insurance v. MarnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Freelander v. G. & K. REALTY CORP.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.