Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Stasiun
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 22, 1965PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
These are appeals from convictions under two indictments. In one (hereinafter called the solicitation indictment) Ernest C. Stasiun, Michael J. Manning and Richard B. Rymszewicz were charged with the offence (G. L. c. 268, § 8) of soliciting a bribe from Paul R. Yer-mette to influence Stasiun’s official action as a member of the Executive Council. In the other (hereinafter called the conspiracy indictment) the same defendants were charged with conspiring to commit the offence charged in the solicitation indictment. The trial, which was subject to G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, resulted in verdicts…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Clune v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. RichardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.