Legal Opinion

Mellon v. Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 31, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for breach of a contract of insurance, and for violation of G. L. c. 93A. The plaintiffs, insured under a homeowner’s policy issued *934by the defendant, Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Hingham), seek to recover for damages sustained when subsurface water entered their basement. Cross motions for summary judgment as to liability only were presented on a statement of agreed facts. A judge of the Superior Court allowed so much of the plaintiffs’ motion as was based on breach of contract. The judge ruled in favor of the defendant on the c. 93A claim. Judgment was entered for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Standard Electric Supply Co. v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  3. Martin J. McDonough v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  4. Slater v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Bettigole v. American Employers InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. HRG Development Corp. v. Graphic Arts Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Vanderbrook v. Unitrin Preferred InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Lit.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API