Legal Opinion
McClendon v. Soos
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 13, 1989No. 7265PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff for damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of an automobile accident. Shelby Mutual Insurance Company (Shelby) sought to intervene in the action as a plaintiff pursuant to General Statutes § 31-293. The trial court denied the motion to intervene as untimely.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the denial of Shelby’s motion to intervene is an appeala-ble final judgment.1 We hold that the denial of Shelby’s motion to intervene was not an appealable final judgment, and that the appeal must therefore be dismissed.
The relevant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. LongoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Skitromo v. Meriden Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Ricard v. Stanadyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Rodia v. Tesco Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Palmer v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Johndrow v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State Board of Education v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Worsham v. GreifenbergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.