Skitromo v. Meriden Yellow Cab Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether an employer who is obligated to pay workers’ compen*486sation benefits to an injured employee may credit against its future compensation liability the amount recovered by that employee in a third party action despite the employer’s failure to intervene in the third party proceedings in the manner prescribed by General Statutes § 31-293.1 We hold that the employer’s failure to intervene in the third party action deprived it of any interest in the employee’s third party recovery, and that the employer, therefore, is not entitled to credit that recovery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Stavola v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Ricard v. Stanadyne, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Rosenbaum v. Hartford News Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Olszewski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Rana v. RitaccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Malatesta v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.