Ricard v. Stanadyne, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
In this case Branch Motor Express Company (hereinafter Branch) seeks to intervene in a personal injury action because it paid worker’s compensation to the plaintiff. The trial court, on objection by the defendant, denied the motion to intervene on the ground that the motion was filed more than thirty days after Branch received notice of the third party action. In its appeal Branch challenges the “standing” of the defendant to object to its motion and the trial court’s construction of General Statutes § 31-293.
Under our practice, except for cases where the applicant has an absolute right to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Stavola v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Jones v. RickerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Olszewski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Rana v. RitaccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.