Legal Opinion

Feld v. Merriam

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1984No. 79 and 80 E.D. Appeal Docket 1983PublishedCited by 460 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

McDERMOTT, Justice.

Peggy and Samuel Feld were tenants in the large Cedar-brook Apartment complex, consisting of 150 acres and 1,000 apartments housed in three high rise buildings. For an *389extra rental fee the apartments are serviced by parking garages adjacent to the apartment buildings. On the evening of June 27, 1975, about 9:00 P.M., the Felds, returning from a social engagement, drove as usual to their allotted space in the parking garage. Then began the events that brings before us the question of a landlord’s liability for the criminal acts of unknown third persons. We are not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Chambers v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Pippin v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by460 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Marshall v. Burger King Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

455 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API