Chanthavong v. Tran
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
• KELLY, Judge.
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the trial court properly limited certain expert testimony and correctly instructed the jury regarding serious injury for purposes of the limited tort alternative under the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law. Based upon the reasoning set forth below, we hold that the trial court erroneously limited the expert testimony and improperly instructed the jury so as to warrant a new trial. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The relevant factual and procedural history of this appeal is…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- O'Donnell Ex Rel. Mitro v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Bindschusz v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Brady ex rel. Brady v. Ballay, Thornton, Maloney Medical Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.