Legal Opinion

Irey v. Mater

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893No. 15,529PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

Mary Irey and Jonah Irey, her husband, brought this action in the court below for the recovery of sixty-one and fifty-two one-hundredths acres of land in Wabash county, and twelve hundred dollars *240for the rents and profits thereof accruing from the possession and use of the same by the appellees. Issues were formed upon the complaint, and upon a cross-complaint by the appellees against the appellants, Mary Irey, Jonah Irey (her second husband), and several others, her children by her first husband, Amos Parrott, deceased. There was a trial by the court, a special finding, and a judgment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Roots v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bryan v. UlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Orton v. TillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Horlacher v. BraffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. McBeth v. WetnightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Mickels v. EllsesserIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re LevinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
  5. Indianapolis Coal Traction Co. v. DaltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API