Legal Opinion

Roots v. Beck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1887No. 12,879PublishedCited by 44 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The appellant’s argument for a reversal of the judgment below relates exclusively to the propriety of certain instructions given by the court at the trial.

The action was by Abraham B. Conwell against Francis M. Roots, the first paragraph of the complaint being in ejectment to recover the possession of certain described real estate; the second was to quiet the title to the same land;: while a third paragraph was trespass, to recover damages for' alleged injuries to the land in dispute.

The defendant below answered specially to the first paragraph of complaint, that he was the owner and in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State v. Portsmouth Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Brown v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Bauman v. GrubbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Davenport v. SebringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wilson v. BrookshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Rennert v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API