Horlacher v. Brafford
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clinton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.
This was a suit brought by the appellee for partition of real estate.
The controlling question is whether the appellee is, as he claims to be, the owner of the undivided one-half of said real estate.
*529The facts in relation to such claim of ownership, as found by the court, are substantially as follows:
James M. Brafford, the father of appellee, died intestate December 15, 1862, the owner in fee simple of the land in controversy, and leaving as his only heirs at law his widow, Isabella Brafford, and their only child, the appellee.
On April 3, 1863, Isabella intermarried with one Daniel L. Starkey,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ketcham v. Brazil Block Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Waters v. LyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Wilmore v. StetlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Irey v. MaterIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Davis v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kelley v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Porter v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Kemery v. ZeiglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Potter v. DailyIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.