Legal Opinion

McBeth v. Wetnight

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1914No. 8,349PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Clay Circuit Court; Paul N. Bogart, Special Judge. Action by Harry C. Wetnight against Sarab J. McBetb and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Hottel J.

This is an action brought by appellee to quiet title to certain real estate. Appellants claimed to be the *49owners of the coal underneath the surface of such real estate and filed a cross-complaint against appellee to quiet their title to all of said real estate, “except the surface thereof”. There was a trial by the court and a request for a special finding of facts. The finding of facts and conclusions of law were in appellee’s favor on his complaint and against appellants on their cross-eomplaint. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment rendered for appellee in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wallace v. Elm Grove Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. City of Logansport v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Huss v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Moore v. HinkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Marengo Cave Co. v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Consolidation Coal Co. v. MutchmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API