In re Levinson
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
NE'ÍERER, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The notes in issue were out of commerce, and title could only be transferred in harmony with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. §§ 9585-9656). Segen v. Fabacher, 136 La. 568 67 South. 369, 34 Am. Bankr. R. 89; In re Frazin, 181 Fed. 307, 104 C. C. A. 529.
Clinton, as trustee, could acquire no title. Schofield v. Baker (D. C.) 212 Fed. 504, affirmed 221 Fed. 322, 136 C. C. A. 320, and 243 U. S. 114, 37 Sup. Ct. 333, 61 L. Ed. 626. Nor can he profit by his omission to schedule the asset or failure to challenge the trustee’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Lilly v. TobbeinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Baker v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donovan & Schuenke v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Schuenke v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Greene v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Appling v. Minarets & Western Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.