Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England v. Heed
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 24, 2004No. 04-1161PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Attorney General of the State of New Hampshire, Peter Heed, acting in his official capacity (“Attorney General”), appeals the district court’s order declaring unconstitutional and enjoining the enforcement of the Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act (the “Act”), 2003 N.H. Laws 173, codified at N.H.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“RSA”) § 132:24-28 (2003).
I. Background
In June 2003, the New Hampshire legislature passed “AN ACT requiring parental notification before abortions may be performed on unemancipated minors,” which states that:
No abortion shall be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Aid for Women v. FoulstonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Ayotte v. Planned ParenthoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Caro-MunizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Bob TaftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.