Legal Opinion

Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 2006No. 04-1144PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

We do not revisit our abortion precedents today, but rather address a question of remedy: If enforcing a statute that regulates access to abortion would be unconstitutional in medical emergencies, what is the appropriate judicial response? We hold that invalidating the statute entirely is not always necessary or justified, for lower courts may be able to render narrower declaratory and injunctive relief.

I

A

In 2003, New Hampshire enacted the Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act. N. H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 132:24-132:28 (2005). The Act prohibits physicians from performing an abortion on a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. In re: Gregg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Steven Warshak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Feminist Women's Health Center v. BurgessSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. Frank v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API