Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
546 U.S. 320 (2006)
AYOTTE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
v.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND ET AL.
No. 04-1144.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 30, 2005.
Decided January 18, 2006.
Kelly A. Ayotte, Attorney General of New Hampshire, petitioner, argued the cause pro se. With her on the briefs were Michael A. Delaney, Deputy Attorney General, Daniel J. Mullen, Associate Attorney General, and Laura E. B. Lombardi and Anthony I. Blenkinsop, Assistant Attorneys General.
Solicitor General Clement argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · O'Connor.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by418 opinions
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Sessions v. Morales-SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
413 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.