Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Bob Taft
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 13, 2006No. 04-4371PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcKEAGUE, J., joined by Rogers, J.,
MOORE, J. (p. 518-519), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part.
AMENDED OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ petition for panel rehearing. Upon consideration of the relevant briefs and the record, we vacate our prior opinion, Planned Parenthood v. Taft, 439 F.3d 304 (6th Cir.2006), and replace it with this amended opinion.
Plaintiffs challenge an Ohio statute which prohibits the off-label use of the abortion drug mifepristone (more commonly known as RU-486). The district court granted a preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the statute…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hall v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Planned Parenthood Southeast Ohio Region v. DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- L. W. v. Jonathan SkrmettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.