State v. Fields
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
The issue on this appeal is whether defendant, O’Darius Marcus Fields, properly challenged an upward durational departure from the presumptive sentence by moving for a modification of the sentence at the hearing on the revocation of the stay of execution of sentence and then appealing from the denial of the motion. The court of appeals, in refusing to decide the validity of the departure, held that in order to get the sentencing issue before the court of appeals the defendant first must formally petition for postconviction relief and then appeal from the denial of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bixby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. LoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Townsend v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.