Legal Opinion
State v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 1, 2005No. A03-1898PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellant John C. Henderson seeks review of an unpublished court of appeals decision affirming his 144-month sentence for first-degree burglary as a career offender under MinmStat. § 609.1095 (2004). Henderson argues that his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial was violated when the district court imposed a sentence that was an upward durational departure under the career offender statute, because the sentencing judge found that Henderson’s offense was part of a pattern of criminal conduct. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
On December 6, 2002, Henderson was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. GaiovnikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.