Legal Opinion

Bixby v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1984No. C1-83-975PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a petition for post-conviction relief. The appeal concerns whether petitioner’s two 1977 convictions of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree were based on a single behavioral incident. If so, then the sentencing court erred in 1982 when, in computing petitioner’s criminal history score in order to determine the presumptive sentence for a current offense of receiving stolen property, it gave petitioner two felony points for the 1977 convictions. We hold that the sentencing court erred and that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HerbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. McAdooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ture v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. KutcharaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State v. NordbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API