State v. Mavis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
The issue on this criminal appeal is whether one effect of the revocation of the probation of defendant Michael Dale Mavis is that he may renege on a promise he made, as part of a guilty plea agreement, to pay extradition costs. The court of appeals held that he need not pay the costs. State v. Mavis, 406 N.W.2d 647 (Minn.App.1987). We hold that Mavis is obliged to pay the costs.
Defendant, while in prison in Nevada on a parole revocation, filed a demand for a speedy trial with Minnesota authorities, who had filed a detainer against him. He was returned to Minnesota for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Schuelke v. Belle Fourche Irrigation DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987