Legal Opinion

Warden v. Lamb

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1929No. Docket No. 3761PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff began this action to quiet title to a certain lot situate in the city of Los Angeles, county of Los Angeles. The defendant Lydia L. Lamb appeared and answered plaintiff’s complaint, denied the plaintiff’s title, and alleged title in herself. On the trial of the issues so joined, judgment was entered in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals. Upon this appeal the chief cause urged by the appellant as ground for reversal herein is “that the court erred in admitting, over plaintiff’s objection, the association of an attorney with the defendant, who appeared in propria…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Simmons v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Prescott v. SalthouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Cuddahy v. GraggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heidary v. YadollahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Wilson v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Ahmanson Bank & Trust Co. v. TepperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Beloin v. BlankenhornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API