Legal Opinion

Cuddahy v. Gragg

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1920No. Civ. No. 3166PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property in Inyo County. Defendant Connor appeals from the decree of foreclosure, given and made after the entry of his default."

Plaintiff, the holder of the mortgage and the promissory notes secured thereby, filed an amended complaint, making parties defendant, besides the mortgagor and maker of the notes, the defendant Connor and others, who, the complaint alleges, claim to have some interest in or lien upon the mortgaged premises as subsequent purchasers or encumbrancers. The summons was served upon Connor in Inyo County on January 25,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Barron v. DelevalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Acock v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Bowers v. DickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Buck v. MorrossisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Warden v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Batchelor v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telelegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API