State v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
The defendant first assigns error to the failure of the court to appoint counsel to represent him. He contends he did not unequivocally waive his right to counsel. The record contains two separate forms, signed by the defendant and a superior court judge, which recite that the defendant waived his right to counsel after being fully advised of his rights and fully understanding the consequences of his action as required by N.C.G.S. § 7A-457 and N.C.G.S. § 15A-1242.
The defendant says that the record shows that in spite of these written waivers of counsel, the defendant equivocated…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.