Legal Opinion

Daniell v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 30, 1903PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action for breach of a written contract, dated May 29, 1891, whereby the defendant agreed, in settlement of claims which the plaintiff had against it for personal injuries while in its employ as freight brakeman and freight conductor, to employ him as station agent at its station in Fairlee, Vermont, so long as he should perform the duties of the place in a thorough, honest and businesslike manner. The plaintiff began work as station agent at Fairlee on June 10,1891, and was discharged on June 16, 1898. The defendant justified the discharge on the ground that he had been guilty of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Daniels v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Ballou v. BillingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Bolles v. SachsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Johnson v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Kirkley v. F. H. Roberts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API