State v. C. R.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the Department of Human Services, Mental Health Division. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in concluding that she suffers from a mental disorder and is a danger to herself. On de novo review, State v. Bodell, 120 Or App 548, 550, 853 P2d 841 (1993), we conclude that the state failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that she is a “mentally ill person” within the meaning of ORS chapter 426. Accordingly, we reverse.
In February 2005, appellant attempted suicide. Five months before the attempt, appellant, a librarian,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. BodellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. EvjenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. R. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. G. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Mesch v. Unity Center for Behavioral HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- State v. CRCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. GLCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.