Legal Opinion

State v. Waites

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 1984No. M-80-6 CA 30881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Appellant challenges his involuntary commitment under ORS 426.130. The issue is whether there is clear and convincing evidence that appellant is mentally ill. We review de novo, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), and reverse.

Sometime in 1983, appellant was released from Dammasch State Hospital after having been involuntarily committed. After his release, he began to receive general assistance payments through Adult and Family Services Division. Those payments ceased on December 17, 1983, and were not to be extended until appellant was re-evaluated by a mental health…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Matter of FletcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Matter of JepsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Matter of TroupeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EvjenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. A. J. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. EvjenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. T. W. W. (In re T. W. W.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API