Legal Opinion

State v. Jayne

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 2001No. 9812-71261; A104696PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*76EDMONDS, P. J.

Appellant appeals from an involuntary mental commitment order. ORS 426.130. She makes two assignments of error. On de novo review, we affirm.

In her first assignment of error, appellant argues that, contrary to ORS 426.095(4)(d)(C),1 the investigation report prepared by the precommitment investigator was admitted without the investigator being present during the hearing to be cross-examined and without appellant’s waiver of the investigator’s presence at the hearing. Appellant concedes that she made no express objection on that ground to the trial court. Nevertheless, she urges…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. EvjenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. HittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API