Legal Opinion

State v. Rode

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. DA454553; CA A74503PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*667De MUNIZ, J.

Defendant was charged with attempted assault in the fourth degree and harassment. ORS 163.160(1); ORS 166.065(l)(a)(A). At arraignment, the district attorney elected to try the cases as violations under ORS 161.565(2). Defendant’s motion for a jury trial was denied, and in a trial to the court, he was found guilty on both charges.

ORS 161.656(2) provides:

“Upon appearance of the defendant upon any misdemeanor charge, other than a misdemeanor created under ORS 811.540 and 813.010, before the court asks under ORS 135.020 how the defendant pleads to the charge, the district attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ESLAMIZARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2004
  2. Alaska Marine Pilots v. HendschAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BonninCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API