Legal Opinion
ESLAMIZAR
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2004No. ID 3502PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 684
(BIA 2004) Interim Decision #3502 In re Hadi ESLAMIZAR, Respondent File A26 095 657 - Portland, Oregon Decided October 19, 2004 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals An alien found guilty of a “violation” under Oregon law in a proceeding conducted pursuant to section 153.076 of the Oregon Revised Statutes does not have a “conviction” for immigration purposes under section 101(a)(48)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A) (2000). FOR RESPONDENT: Brian Patrick Conry, Esquire, Portland,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Plasencia-Ayala v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- BABAISAKOVBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Batrez Gradiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Bernardo Castillo v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Fernando Diaz-Quirazco v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.