Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 18, 1989No. DA 362219-8802; CA A49453PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*34EDMONDS, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding her guilty of theft in the third degree, a violation. ORS 164.043. Before defendant pled not guilty to the charge, the trial court, pursuant to ORS 161.565(2),1 amended the complaint to convert the charge from a misdemeanor to a violation. In a trial to the court, she was found guilty.2 Defendant argues that she was denied her constitutional rights under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment as a defendant in a criminal proceeding. We reverse.3

ORS 161.565(2) empowered the court to reduce a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Portland v. TuttleOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Behnke v. JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RodeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. CaravityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API