Legal Opinion

State v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 2012No. 100748130; A147724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting her of two violations, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to be tried by a jury and proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant also assigns error to the admission of hearsay evidence. Because we reverse and remand on defendant’s first assignment of error, we do not reach her second.

The facts of this case are largely procedural. Defendant was charged with two misdemeanor offenses, third-degree theft, ORS 164.043, and attempted first-degree theft, ORS 164.055; ORS 161.405, as a result of an incident in which she was accused…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. RodeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BenoitOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. FullerOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. WhittenMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API