Legal Opinion

Nevada Land Inv. Corp. v. Sistrunk

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1934No. Docket No. Sac. 4809PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants herein, Z. R. Sistrunk and his wife, Cora Sistrunk, have appealed from a judgment decreeing that the agreement, whereby the plaintiff had agreed to sell to the defendants the lands described in the complaint, be canceled; that plaintiff be restored .to the full possession thereof and the defendants be ejected and enjoined from asserting or claiming any right, title or interest therein. By its complaint the plaintiff set up that the Garden Highway Orchard Company was the owner in fee and entitled to the possession of the premises in dispute and that on April 23, 1925, it entered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Gray v. DefaUtah Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API