Legal Opinion
Horsey v. Harris
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1457PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mae Horsey, proceeding pro se, brings this action against defendant Seth D. Harris in his capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor (“Department”). 1 The events giving rise to this case stem from Horsey’s employment at the Department. Her complaint, liberally construed, alleges discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.; violations of the merit system…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gilliard v. Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Morris v. Carter Global Lee, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Briscoe v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Mills v. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jideani v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.