Legal Opinion

Squire, Supt. v. Standen, Gdn.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1939No. 27058PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Section 3, Article XIII, of the Constitution, as effective from January 1, 1913, to July 1, 1937, provided “* * * that stockholders of corporations authorized to receive money on deposit shall be held individually responsible, equally and ratably, and not one for another, for all contracts, debts and engagements of such corporations, to the extent of the amount of their stock therein, at the par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in such shares. ’ ’

"While this provision of the Constitution was self-executing and did not need legislation to make it effective, the General…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Early v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Seabury v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Piedmont & Northern Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Smathers v. Bank.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Commissioner of Banks v. Tremont Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Squire, Supt. of Banks v. CramerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Arrowhead Investments, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API