Legal Opinion

Smathers v. Bank.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1904PublishedCited by 29 opinions

ActioN by George H. Smathers and others against the Western Carolina Bank and others, heard by Judge B. F. Long, at March Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Buncombe County. Erom a judgment for the plaintiffs, the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNor, J.

This action, in tbe nature of a bill in equity, was brought by George TI. Smathers, Receiver of tbe Western Carolina Bank, in which a number of creditors in behalf of themselves and all other creditors of said bank joined, against the bank and certain stockholders thereof for the purpose of enforcing the statutory liability imposed upon the stockholders for the indebtednes of the bank by chapter 298, Public Laws 1897. The complaint sets forth the incorporation and organization of the bank, the names and number of shares held by each stockholder and date of becoming such stockholder, and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Marshall Foundry Co. v. . KillianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Merchants National Bank of Richmond v. Newton Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Ross v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Burnet v. Lexington Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  5. Douglass v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API