Legal Opinion
State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Porter
California Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1942No. L. A. No. 18302PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
— The State of Ohio, on the relation of S. H. Squire, Superintendent of Banks in charge of liquidation of The Union Trust Company of Cleveland, commenced this action on May 26, 1936, in Los Angeles County, to enforce an alleged stockholders’ liability against the defendant. In his answer the defendant raised the point that the cause of action was barred by the provisions of section 359 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. The case ivas tried on stipulated facts, judgment was for plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.
The Union Trust Company was a banking corporation. It was organized and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Great Western Telegraph Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Royal Trust Co. v. MacBeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ashland Chemical Co. v. ProvenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Firemen's Insurance v. DiskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- McMillen v. Douglas Aircraft Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
- Boyle v. LampeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Squire v. MerriamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942