Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Arrowhead Investments, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The action below involved an attempt on the part of the Superintendent of Banks, under authority of Section 710-75, General Code, to collect the superadded or double liability from the defendants George B. Nobil and Charles E. Schwartz, the appellants in this court, who are alleged to be the owners of capital stock in an insolvent banking institution.

Prior to April 7,1933, the defendant George B. Nobil was the owner of 12 shares of the capital stock of the First-Central Trust Company, of Akron, Ohio, and the defendant Charles E. Schwartz was the owner of 25 shares thereof. On April 7, 1933,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Squire, Supt. v. SolinskiOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Squire, Supt. v. Standen, Gdn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Squire v. Murfey, Blossom & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duncan v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Calvin H. East and Joyce E. East v. William W. Crowdus, Receiver of All Assets and Property of Arthur C. Costello and Investment Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API