Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. Porter

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1942No. L. A. No. 18302Published

1DissentTraynor, J.

— I dissent. Statutes of limitation are procedural statutes that operate to bar the remedy after a reasonable time for bringing suit upon an accrued cause of action, has elapsed. They are not intended to alter or destroy the substantive rights or liabilities involved. (See 34 Am. Jur. 15.) When enforcement is sought in the courts of one state of a right created under the law of another, the law of the forum governs matters of procedure, including the period of limitation imposed upon the remedy. (Restatement, Conflict of Laws, §§ 603, 604.) Invoking the general rule with respect to statutes…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API