Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Orzelek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 30, 2006, which, among other things, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a mill work specialist at a retail home improvement center from September 2005 until July 2006. He was discharged after he repeatedly violated the employer’s attendance policy. Claimant applied for and received unemployment insurance benefits in the amount of $108.50. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, however,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of SchnabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re JaiyesimiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. In re JaiyesimiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API