Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Schnabel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 17, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 20, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was discharged from her employment as an account specialist for an office supply business due to disqualifying misconduct. Claimant had been previously suspended for three days due to excessive tardiness and absences when, on her first scheduled return…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AronsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of FrazierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. In re the Claim of ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re the Claim of OrzelekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re the Claim of ArmellinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API