Goldbacher v. Eggers
New York Supreme Court
Action to compel the removal of a wall alleged to encroach upon plaintiff’s premises and for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.
' This is a suit to compel the removal' of a wall alleged to encroach upon plaintiff’s premises and to recover dam"ages. The only point at issue is whether defendant’s westerly wall stands upon plaintiff’s lot, No. 3114 Third avenue. The *37plaintiff claims that defendant’s wall encroaches over her easterly line on a wedge-shaped strip ten inches wide on the street or north front; three inches wide in the rear and running back thirty-three feet and four inches. The defendant denies any encroachment. It is conceded that the plaintiff’s easterly boundary and the defendant’s westerly boundary are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Corning v. . Troy Iron and Nail FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Amerman v. . DeaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Baron v. . KornNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goodfarb v. FreedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Haber v. Paramount Ice Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Lawrence v. MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Owenson v. BradLeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Bouvier v. SegardiNew York Supreme Court · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.