Legal Opinion
Bouvier v. Segardi
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action for the enforcement of a restrictive covenant.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The plaintiff, by his first alleged cause of action, seeks judgment that the defendants be restrained from maintaining a show window or structure erected in the year 1906 upon the westerly half of the front of the premises known as No. 10 West Fortynsixth street, in the borough of Manhattan, city of New Tork, in violation of a restrictive covenant or set-back agreement. The second alleged cause of action seeks the removal of a portion of the structure above referred to, which it is alleged actually encroaches upon the plaintiff’s premises, known as No. 12 West Forty-sixth street. The facts as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. HensleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Christopher v. RosseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- McCain Realty Co. v. AylesworthNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Wallack Construction Co. v. Smalwich Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1960